Tuesday, October 24, 2006

The 9/11 Truth Political Party





I think everyone can agree that the campaign to get the information out there to the people has been a resounding success thus far, the results to every poll are a testament to that.

Is it time to take the next step and start wielding some of the power this movement has accumulated? It is often said that senior citizens wield a considerable amount of political might in the United States. For the most part this is because they have numbers and they get out and vote, reliably and consistantly. While I think their power has somewhat decreased in recent years, there can be no doubt that political candidates make concessions to this power, and even at times go out of their way to mollify them, if for no other reason than through the fear that this voting bloc may come out in strength against them. I feel that the Truth Movement could rival this power and most likely excede it.

We certainly have the numbers on our side. Just look at any of the many online polls and you see the numbers... remember the Charlie Sheen poll? How about the 0wnage of the United 93 forums? Hell, check some net traffic reports or data on search terms, 9/11 Truth sites are some of the busiest out there. That's some serious numbers.

As important as the numbers is the motivation. I think this speaks for itself. Seriously, untold thousands of people burning and a distrubting tens of thousands of videos, spreading the word, protesting. Has any movement in history spread so far so fast?

There is something else we can bring to the table, something extremely powerful and something they want more than anything. The power to spread information like its never been spread before. The Truth Movement itself, its numbers and its widespread message, is living proof of this power. It is the ultimate grass roots movement and still gaining momentum all the time. This is internet power, and then some. I think it's time we harnessed this power and wielded it creatively and with devastating results.

Look at the current elections, they are being fought tooth and nail, every seat counts and the balance of power is in play, ready to be swayed by a concerted effort (by some group like us). What do you think politicians would promise for tens of thousands (or more) of votes? How about a lightning fast tried and true "get the word out" internet campaign? How about a negative campaign against their opponents, performed by some of the most stuborn dirt-digging researchers in the world? How about an instant rally, or protest, when and where needed (have sign will travel)? How much would that be worth to a candidate? I think a whole helluva lot. They are already spending tens of millions of dollars to reach less people in a much more inefficient and ineffective manner.

Oh sure, they're catching on to this whole 'internet thing' and some of them even know what they're doing, but really they're out of their element and they know it. So, that brings us to the question; What can they do for us?

Of course, I know we're a very diverse community and we do not all agree on many of what they try to tell us are 'key issues', and that's okay. I think we can put all that aside for the greater good and concentrate on the ones that bring us together. In fact, I have a strong feeling that many of these so-called 'key issues' are nothing more than an attempt to divide the people.

I say keep it simple, stick to the basics and those issues that are related, at least at first. On the main issue; We do NOT ask someone to commit political suicide by going on the record screaming 'Inside Job!' or anything like that. We back candidates that are for opening a new and truly independent investigation, an investigation that has carte blanche power to subpoena anyone or anything, as well as unlimited clearance to review any and all evidence as well as the power to compel cooperation.

As for the 'related' category, support could be given for those who are willing to help undo the damage done by this crime. Ending the ridiculous wars the phony 9/11 lies led to would be a start, as well as repealing the laws this phony war on terror has engendered and of course securing internet freedom that we may continue our campaigns unimpeded.

It's simple economics. We're giving them something they want and in return we're getting some results. Woe to those that don't live up to any bargains they make, for we will keep track and those who cross us will face our wrath. Using these same skills, honed in researching and engaging in information warfare, which are coveted by politicians, we will have the ability to ensure compliance of any promisses made or ensure the end of the careers of those who do not deal fairly with us.

As time goes by and our stength is realized by more of them, we can expand the issues we back and field our own candidates (some are already in the mix and deserve our support), possibly even think about founding our own political party. The time has never been more ripe for a third party.

In essence, I'm saying... we've grown some muscles here... lets flex them.

And for the nay-sayers, let me just address some things in advance. I know full well the political system is corrupted, and I know there is rampant election fraud and vote rigging going on. I know all about the whole false left-right paradigm. The fact is though, as can clearly be seen by anyone, there are factions within our corrupt system and between those factions are cracks... we can wriggle into those cracks and try to do something. Further, the more boots on the ground we get out there, the less believable any frauds will be and that alone could be enough to get the masses riled up and ready for change. Finally, if nothing else, because we will have exausted every possible remedy before it comes to outright rebellion and insurection, and in the battle which is sure to ensue after that, we will have the moral high ground.

The one and only reservation I have regarding this plan would be that it may well be too late. I feel there is a good chance that we may be looking at martial law and a complete police state takeover sometime in the next few weeks, especially on election day or perhaps following the next soon to come false-flag attack... if that is the case, to those who survive I will see you in the underground resistance my brethren. Still, it is as likely things will be drawn out further and in that case we should definitely be implementing this power, and now. It may still be possible to nip this in the bud and prevent the nightmare scenario.

If there is any chance at all, shouldn't we take it?

(Thanks to Inheritor for the illustration)

13 comments:

reprehensor said...

Nice. Drop by sometime...

http://911blogger.com

CHF said...

Yes! I've been suggesting this for months!

Yes, twoofers - humiliate yourselves in front of the whole world.

JIM FETZER FOR PRESIDENT!

CHF said...

Of course you loons will first have to agree on a story....

Pentagon - 757, cargo plane, missile, car bomb...?

WTC - 757, cargo planes, podes, no pods, missiles...?

Flight 93 - shot down, landed in Cleveland...?

Isn't it weird how you twoofers claim that the proof of an "inside job" is overwhelming and yet you can't agree on what that proof says?

cialackeytakeajump said...

Building 7 WTC - why did it collapse 5.20pm sept 11 when no plane hit it?

constitution-hugger said...

This can be so simple...

It is possible to gauge honest candidates (and the 911 truth movement) by the same yardstick:

If they are not willing to question President Bush about Bush's own, repeated, incriminating, self-implicating statements, then they are part of the problem and not part of the solution.

Failing to ever even ask the right questions is a guaranteed way of never getting the right answers.

Bush made the well-documented statements, and Democrats (and Republicans), and the 9-11 Commission, and so much of the 911 truth movement, all just pretend he didn't!

Fake opposition fools most of the people most of the time...

OWN-the-NWO said...

damn TS, you already have your own personal troll how cute is that!

OWN-the-NWO said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CHF said...

cialackeytakeajump,

WTC7 has been addressed a thousand times.

http://www.debunking911.com/pull.htm

It was heavily damaged by debris and fire and a firefighter transit reading indicated that it was leaning over before it fell. Bombs don't make buildings tilt

Here's a crazy idea: why don't you ask a structural engineer or a demolition company about WTC7 and ask them if they think it was destroyed with bombs. For some reason twoofers hate that kind of research.

Anonymous said...

It would work a bit. At least we could get on record of trying. I'm opposed to candidates who never mention the 911 attacks at all-and there are a lot of them. How about a commitment to flat ask them-"what do you think about the 9 11 commision"?

Anonymous said...

Here's an interesting 9/11 page...

Link

Anonymous said...

Here's an interesting 9/11 page...

http://home.comcast.net/~plutarch/911.html

Simon Lazarus said...

I agree. It would be nice to see the Democrats finally have a party of nuts and cranks to compare policies with.

Conspiracy Smasher said...

How about the 0wnage of the United 93 forums?


Please. There were about ten people on that forum with a handful of them being your fellow conspiradroids. What does that prove exactly?